
Adobe's head of product, Scott Belsky, and VP of legal and policy, Dana Rao, claim that customer content is not used to train any generative AI tools. They emphasized that customers own their content and that Adobe does not assume ownership of their work or train its AI on user data. The company faced backlash over changes in its terms of service, which led to updates and clarifications regarding AI and content ownership.

Adobe's subscribers interpreted the original changes to the terms of service as allowing the company to access, view, or listen to their content, including sensitive content such as information protected by non-disclosure agreements5. Users also believed that Adobe could use their work to train the company's generative AI models and potentially resell them. Additionally, there were concerns that Adobe could take ownership of users' copyrighted material. These interpretations led to a backlash and outrage among the creative community, with many considering canceling their Adobe subscriptions.

Adobe is planning to make several updates to its terms of service in response to the backlash:
Additionally, Adobe will be listening to customer feedback around the new changes.