
It is important for benchmarks to accommodate multiple valid pathways to completing a task because real-world scenarios often have diverse solutions034. This flexibility ensures a fair and comprehensive evaluation of an agent's performance, reflecting its ability to adapt and function effectively across different environments and circumstances036.

According to the Crab framework analysis, multi-agent structures face challenges in planning, memory management, and handling complex interactions and layered context information018. These challenges stem from the dynamic nature of agent roles, relationships, and the need for contextual adaptability in response to internal and external factors1.

Single-agent configurations in the Crab framework focus on tasks performed by one agent within a single or cross-environment setup. Multi-agent configurations, however, involve multiple agents collaborating or interacting within these environments, allowing for the assessment of cooperative behavior, coordination, and parallel task execution, providing a more comprehensive evaluation of agent performance.