
Europe's association of chambers of commerce, Eurochambres, is calling for several measures to help businesses deal with the challenges they are facing and to boost their self-confidence. Some of the key suggestions include:
These measures are aimed at creating a more business-friendly environment, fostering innovation, and enhancing the competitiveness of European businesses in the global market.

Nicolai Tangen, the CEO of Norway's $1.6 trillion oil fund, believes that ambition plays a significant role in the economic disparities between Europe, the United States, and China. In an interview with the Financial Times, Tangen highlighted a gap in the "general level of ambition" between Europeans and Americans6. He stated that this difference in ambition has led to U.S. shares substantially outperforming their European counterparts.
Tangen noted that Americans tend to work harder and have a higher level of ambition compared to Europeans. He also pointed out that there is a mindset issue in terms of accepting mistakes and taking risks4. In the U.S., if a business fails, individuals generally get another chance, whereas in Europe, failure tends to have more severe consequences.
Additionally, Tangen mentioned that European companies are facing challenges in innovation and technology due to this gap in ambition. He observed that American companies are growing faster in these areas, which has contributed to the success of the U.S. stock market.
In conclusion, Nicolai Tangen believes that ambition is a crucial factor contributing to the economic disparities between Europe, the United States, and China. He suggests that Europeans need to become more ambitious, take more risks, and embrace a mindset of learning from failure in order to compete on a global scale.

The potential long-term consequences for Europe if it continues to lag behind the United States and China economically are multifaceted.
Loss of Global Influence: Europe's decreasing share of the global economy could lead to a diminished ability to shape global rules and standards. This could result in a world order increasingly defined by the US and China, potentially sidelining European interests and values.
Economic Stagnation: A continued lag could lead to economic stagnation, with lower growth rates, fewer job opportunities, and reduced innovation. This could exacerbate social and economic problems within European countries, such as income inequality and social unrest.
Dependency on Other Economies: Europe's economic lag could lead to an increased dependency on the US and China. This could affect Europe's ability to make independent decisions, as it may have to consider the economic implications of its actions in relation to these two superpowers.
Brain Drain: Highly skilled individuals may seek better opportunities elsewhere, leading to a brain drain that could further impede Europe's economic growth and competitiveness.
Political Instability: Economic difficulties often lead to political instability. If Europe continues to lag behind, it could lead to the rise of more extremist political movements, potentially threatening the democratic stability of the region.
Underfunded Social Programs: With a sluggish economy, there may be less money available for social programs, potentially leading to a lower quality of life for European citizens.
In summary, if Europe continues to lag behind the US and China economically, it could face a range of challenges including loss of global influence, economic stagnation, increased dependency on other economies, brain drain, political instability, and underfunded social programs.