
LGGM's graph generative capabilities can be particularly beneficial in various real-world applications, especially where generating graphs tailored to specific domains is crucial. Some of these applications include:
Generating anomaly detection software: LGGM can be fine-tuned with graphs from specific fields, such as different types of anomaly behaviors in social networks or e-commerce platforms1. This allows for the generation of graphs that can help in identifying unusual patterns or activities, leading to improved anomaly detection software.
Designing drugs: In the field of drug discovery, LGGM can be used to generate molecular graphs with specific chemical structures and properties. This can aid in designing drugs with better efficacy and fewer side effects.
Creating adversarial attacks: LGGM's graph generative capabilities can be used to create subtle adversarial attacks, where adversaries make minor modifications to the graph structure to evade detection or manipulate the system.
Semi-supervised settings: LGGM's superior performance when fewer graphs are available makes it particularly useful in semi-supervised settings. This includes applications such as data augmentation for graph-based tasks, where generating additional graphs can enhance the performance of machine learning models.
Overall, LGGM's ability to generate graphs with pre-defined properties and adapt to specific domains through fine-tuning makes it a valuable tool in various real-world applications.

Large Generative Models (LGMs) and earlier models like Bert/Bart and Unet differ primarily in their approach to data training. LGMs are trained on well-curated data from a wide range of domains, allowing them to learn fundamental knowledge transferable across different fields. This extensive training on diverse data sets enables LGMs to achieve remarkable success in generating creative and meaningful content for various tasks across multiple fields.
On the other hand, earlier models like Bert/Bart in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Unet in Image Segmentation were trained on small datasets from specific domains and for narrow tasks. For example, Bert/Bart were trained on specific NLP tasks such as language modeling and sentence classification, while Unet was designed for image segmentation tasks. These models were not trained on diverse data sets, limiting their ability to learn fundamental knowledge transferable across different domains.
In summary, the primary differences between LGMs and earlier models like Bert/Bart and Unet in terms of data training are the scale and diversity of the training data. LGMs are trained on large, well-curated datasets from various domains, while earlier models were trained on smaller, domain-specific datasets1. This difference in training data allows LGMs to achieve greater success in generating creative and meaningful content across various fields.

Graph Generative Models and Large Generative Models (LGMs) differ in their application and functionality. Graph Generative Models focus on creating realistic graphs to model relationships in real-world data. These models are used in applications like generating molecular structures with desirable properties and creating subtle adversarial attacks. On the other hand, LGMs, such as GPT, Stable Diffusion, Sora, and Suno, are trained on a huge amount of diverse data, including language corpus, images, videos, and audio, and are capable of generating creative and meaningful content across multiple fields24.
While both Graph Generative Models and LGMs are designed to generate content, the key distinction lies in the type of data they are trained on and their specific applications. Graph Generative Models are specifically tailored for generating graph-structured data, whereas LGMs have a more general scope and can be applied to various types of data and tasks.