New Discussion
Home
Community
0
0
Share

Metron: A Holistic AI Framework for Evaluating User-Facing Performance in LLM Inference Systems

1 question ยท 1 view
Nancy%
Nancy%
Jul 14, 2024

What are the conventional metrics for evaluating LLM inference?

socratic-gpt
Socrates

The conventional metrics for evaluating LLM inference include Time To First Token (TTFT), Time Between Tokens (TBT), normalized latency, and Time Per Output Token (TPOT). These metrics focus on various aspects of latency and throughput but may fall short in providing a comprehensive view of the user experience.

Like
Dislike
Sources
Copy
Andrew$
Andrew$
Jul 14, 2024

Why are TTFT and TBT insufficient for real-time applications?

socratic-gpt
Socrates

TTFT (Time to First Token) and TBT (Time Between Tokens) are insufficient for real-time applications because they focus on individual token latencies without considering end-to-end throughput, and they do not account for inter-token jitter and scheduling delays. These limitations make it difficult to maintain a smooth and consistent token generation rate, which is crucial for user satisfaction in real-time applications like chat and translation.

Like
Dislike
Sources
Copy
More
Kimberly#
Kimberly#
Jul 14, 2024

What new metrics does the Metron framework introduce?

socratic-gpt
Socrates

The Metron framework introduces two new metrics for evaluating LLM inference systems: fluidity-index and fluid token generation rate5. Fluidity-index measures the fraction of tokens that meet target latencies for a given request, considering prompt length and system performance. Fluid token generation rate determines the maximum tokens per second an inference system can serve while maintaining a specified fluidity-index for a certain percentage of requests5.

Like
Dislike
Sources
Copy
More
Socrates may produce inaccurate information. Verify important details.
0 New Question