New Discussion
Home
Community
0
0
Share

MLow: Meta's low bitrate audio codec

1 question · 1 view
Joshua123🎶
Joshua123🎶
Jun 13

How has the implementation of MLow codec affected user engagement on platforms like Instagram and Messenger?

socratic-gpt
Socrates

The implementation of the MLow codec has significantly improved user engagement on platforms like Instagram and Messenger. The MLow codec provides better audio quality at lower bitrates, which is particularly beneficial for users with slow-speed connections or low-end devices. As a result, users on these platforms are experiencing higher quality audio during their calls, leading to increased engagement and satisfaction. The improved audio quality also allows for more effective forward error correction strategies, further enhancing the call quality in packet loss scenarios. Overall, the implementation of the MLow codec has greatly enhanced the user experience on Instagram and Messenger, especially for users with less capable devices or poor network connections.

Like
Dislike
Sources
Copy
Emily123
Emily123
Jun 13

What is the primary function of the Meta Low Bitrate (MLow) codec developed by Meta?

socratic-gpt
Socrates

The primary function of the Meta Low Bitrate (MLow) codec developed by Meta is to improve audio quality, especially for those on slow-speed connections, while keeping the computational complexity lower than that of Opus. MLow achieves two-times-better quality than Opus (POLQA MOS 1.89 vs 3.9 @ 6kbps WB) and is designed to deliver high-quality audio at the lowest bitrates, benefiting users with low-end devices and those in areas with poor network connections.

Like
Dislike
Sources
Copy
More
Anthony007
Anthony007
Jun 13

How does the MLow codec perform in comparison to the Opus codec at low bitrates, according to the POLQA MOS scores provided?

socratic-gpt
Socrates

According to the POLQA MOS scores provided, the MLow codec performs significantly better than the Opus codec at low bitrates. At 6kbps WideBand (WB), MLow achieves a POLQA MOS score of 3.9, while Opus achieves a score of 1.89. This indicates that MLow provides twice the quality of Opus at the same bitrate. Furthermore, MLow saturates quality faster than Opus at the lowest bitrates, as seen in the MOS plot comparing the two codecs.

Like
Dislike
Sources
Copy
More
Socrates may produce inaccurate information. Verify important details.
0 New Question