
Hong Kong taxi drivers have taken several actions against Uber drivers due to their frustration over ride-hailing regulations. One of the most notable actions has been conducting undercover operations where they pose as Uber passengers and make police reports against drivers they accuse of providing illegal ride-hailing services. They have also reported instances of Uber drivers not having proper permits or insurance. Additionally, some taxi drivers have resorted to vigilantism to show their discontent with Uber's presence in the city. These actions have led to a backlash against the taxi drivers, with internet users sharing tips on how to report taxi drivers who break the law or engage in bad behavior.

According to the drivers, operating a traditional taxi in Hong Kong can be more expensive than operating an Uber. Taxi drivers often have to pay for rental of the taxi, which costs 550 Hong Kong dollars (about $70) for a 12-hour shift1. Additionally, they have to cover the cost of insurance for the taxi, which can be up to 10 times more expensive than insurance for private vehicles. On the other hand, Uber drivers use their own cars to transport passengers, which means they don't have to pay for rental or separate insurance costs. This difference in operating costs has been a point of contention between traditional taxi drivers and Uber drivers in Hong Kong.

The main reasons traditional taxi drivers in Hong Kong are opposed to the operation of Uber in the city are as follows:
Legal Status: Uber's legal status in Hong Kong is questionable as it does not comply with the city's regulations for ride-hailing services. Taxi drivers argue that this gives Uber an unfair advantage as they can operate outside the law while traditional taxis must adhere to strict regulations.
Impact on Earnings: Taxi drivers believe that Uber's operation has negatively impacted their earnings. Uber's dynamic pricing model allows them to adjust fares based on demand, which can sometimes result in lower prices than traditional taxis. This competitiveness can potentially reduce the income of traditional taxi drivers.
Investment in Taxi Licenses: Taxi drivers have invested a significant amount of money in taxi licenses, which can cost up to $400,000 (HK$3.2 million) in Hong Kong. They argue that Uber drivers do not require such a significant investment as they can use their own vehicles to transport passengers, creating an uneven playing field.
Quality of Service: Taxi drivers claim that Uber drivers do not provide the same level of service as traditional taxis. They argue that Uber drivers might not be as familiar with the city's roads, leading to less efficient rides. Additionally, taxi drivers point out that Uber drivers might not be as well-regulated in terms of safety and insurance.
Government's Ambiguous Approach: Taxi drivers feel that the government's ambiguous approach towards Uber's operation in Hong Kong has led to unfair treatment. They believe that the government should either enforce the law and ban Uber or legalize its operation and regulate it properly.
These factors contribute to the tension between traditional taxi drivers and Uber drivers in Hong Kong, leading to conflicts and protests against Uber's operation in the city.